Home>lolNews> Viper and Xun discuss issues within BLG! The LOL veteran finally stops supporting Bin. >

Viper and Xun discuss issues within BLG! The LOL veteran finally stops supporting Bin.

Preface: As the world's most popular esports competition, League of Legends is highly regarded by many viewers and casters who prioritize performance. Players who achieve good results receive widespread praise, while those underperforming face criticism and doubt. Recently, BLG's top laner Bin has been criticized by many LPL casters and industry insiders due to his poor performance in MSI and EWC, even by the LOL veteran Xiaoxiao, who 'liked Bin' the most, who 'published a surrender letter' and stated that he would also start to criticize Bin from now on.

After BLG, the LPL's recognized strongest club, was eliminated in the first round of the EWC knockout stage, many LPL viewers and BLG fans were collectively devastated. After all, in the EWC quarterfinals, HLE, BLG's acknowledged major rival, had already been eliminated by T1, so many fans were fantasizing about BLG advancing to the finals and winning the championship. However, something that left many viewers speechless happened: BLG surprisingly lost to DK. This result sparked widespread discussion online, and even many LPL players and streamers began live-streaming replays to analyze the reasons for BLG's crushing defeat.

So far, most replays have pointed the finger at Bin, believing that his lack of team play caused BLG's upset loss. BLG's jungler Xun and AD carry Viper have also responded to BLG's current internal issues in recent interviews and posts. Xun said in an interview that BLG currently lacks team communication and coordination, leading to chaotic team fights. Viper even posted an apology after the match, revealing that BLG's team communication is not as good as before. With both Xun and Viper speaking out, many viewers are wondering why BLG is having communication problems.

LOL veteran refuses to support Bin.

After Bin's continued poor performance, many industry insiders have spoken out against Bin. Even the LOL veteran Xiaoxiao publicly posted after the EWC match, stating that he would join the "fun-seekers" group and no longer defend Bin. Following Xiaoxiao's "public surrender," many LOL viewers flocked to his personal account for a "team-building" event. Many viewers also hoped that Xiaoxiao would post again to apologize to the other BLG players and help clear their names.

It should be noted that after BLG lost to HLE during MSI, all viewers were criticizing Bin for his attitude. However, Xiaoxiao stood alone to support Bin, saying that Bin shouldn't be blamed for the loss to HLE, and even dragged Viper and Xun into it, claiming that the other players also had many issues. But after the EWC match, Xiaoxiao directly deleted all his previous statements supporting Bin. Many viewers even discovered that the current BLG is essentially being carried by the mid laner, jungler, and support, with Bin being dragged along. As long as Bin doesn't mess up, they can win easily, but Bin can't even do the bare minimum.

Of course, many viewers also want to know how BLG's management will handle Bin in the future. After BLG narrowly lost to HLE in MSI, many viewers suggested that BLG find a substitute for Bin. However, many industry insiders at the time stated that BLG would not make Bin a substitute and that Bin was the absolute core of BLG. But after the EWC match, many viewers believe that Bin is now a "time bomb." If they don't find a substitute for Bin, BLG might miss out on the championship at Worlds because of him.

Conclusion

Currently, the only notable top laners left in the LPL are 369 and Breathe. Many viewers suggest that BLG's management invite 369 and Breathe for trials. If they perform well during the trials, they can join BLG as Bin's substitutes, which would also put some pressure on Bin. Do you think this method is feasible? I feel that as long as Bin's mindset doesn't have problems, he still has a chance to compete for the title of the world's best top laner.

Comment (0)
No data